CEO Plan: The Inbox Is The Product β Unified Order Processing UX
CEO Plan: The Inbox Is The Product β Unified Order Processing UX
Section titled βCEO Plan: The Inbox Is The Product β Unified Order Processing UXβGenerated by /plan-ceo-review on 2026-03-21 Branch: docs/unified-inbox-design-v2 | Mode: SCOPE EXPANSION Repo: ERP-Unlocked/ordermatic
10x Check
Section titled β10x CheckββThe Intelligent Order Deskβ β The unified inbox doesnβt just show orders, it works them:
- Smart customer-to-rep routing based on ERP data (DEFERRED)
- SLA timers visible on every row with configurable thresholds (ACCEPTED)
- Inline order editing β full-width detail view with PDF + extracted data side-by-side, no page transitions (ACCEPTED)
- Team performance dashboard β orders/person, time-to-ERP, auto-validation rate, coverage chart (ACCEPTED)
- Snooze for orders waiting on customer confirmation (ACCEPTED)
- βSend test orderβ for onboarding aha moment (ACCEPTED)
Platonic Ideal
Section titled βPlatonic IdealβThe user opens ordermatic and sees their work queue. Every order β email, upload, API β is a single row. The row tells them everything: who sent it, whatβs in it, what confidence the AI has, whether it needs attention or was auto-submitted. They press Enter and see the PDF and extracted data side by side. They fix one item, press Cmd+Enter, and itβs in the ERP. They press j to move to the next order. 50 orders in 20 minutes.
The manager sees the same view but with team context: whoβs working on what, whatβs stuck, whatβs about to breach SLA. They see a coverage chart: βThis week: 92% of orders through ordermatic.β
The experience feels like Superhuman for order processing β fast, keyboard-driven, zero-distraction.
Core Architecture Decision
Section titled βCore Architecture DecisionβApproach A: workItems table β New table that extracts inbox workflow state from emailEvents.providerMetadata and becomes the single source of truth for all order workflow. Separate FK columns (emailEventId, pdfDocumentId, orderId) for DB-enforced referential integrity.
workItems FK Constraints
Section titled βworkItems FK ConstraintsβExactly one of emailEventId, pdfDocumentId, or clonedFromWorkItemId must be non-null (the source).
orderId is nullable and set once extraction succeeds and an ERP order record is created.
extractedOrderId is nullable and set once PDF extraction produces an extracted order.
DB check constraint enforces exactly-one-source invariant:
CHECK (num_nonnulls(email_event_id, pdf_document_id, cloned_from_work_item_id) = 1)
Permissions Model
Section titled βPermissions ModelβUses existing hasElevatedInboxAccess() from src/lib/inbox/permissions.ts. Supervisors are users
with roles: manager, org:manager, branch_manager, org:branch_manager, order_desk, org:order_desk,
admin, org:admin, or org:owner. Regular users can only self-assign and manage their own work items.
Current Email Processing Architecture
Section titled βCurrent Email Processing ArchitectureβThe system uses an event-driven architecture β no polling:
Email β Cloudflare Email Routing β email-worker (CF Worker) β[Parse MIME | Hard/soft filter | Alias lookup | LLM triage | Upload PDFs] βPOST /api/webhook/inbound-email (HMAC-signed) β[Create emailEvent | Link PDFs | Start Temporal PDFExtractionWorkflow] βTemporal: PDFExtractionWorkflow β extract β match β enrich β validate β (on user submit or auto-validation pass)Temporal: ERPOrderSubmissionWorkflow β submit to ERP β confirmWhere dual-write hooks in: The /api/webhook/inbound-email handler in the webapp creates
the emailEvent. The workItem INSERT goes in the same transaction, right after the emailEvent
INSERT. For uploads, the /api/pdf-documents upload handler creates the workItem.
Background jobs use Temporal, not the legacy Trigger.dev stack. New scheduled work (unsnooze cron, backfill) should be Temporal scheduled workflows. Dagster handles ERP data syncing only (customers, products, inventory) β not inbox workflow.
Key Technical Decisions
Section titled βKey Technical Decisionsβ- Source FKs: Separate nullable FK columns (not polymorphic sourceId). See FK constraints above.
- SLA config: Org-level only (single threshold per org, extend to per-customer later)
- Feature flags: Single
unified_inbox_v2flag per org (not granular per-feature) - Uploads: Auto-assigned to uploader, personal inbox. Only supervisors can reassign. Upload + workItem creation wrapped in a single DB transaction (no orphaned PDFs).
- Auto-archive: On ERP approval/completion. Clone from archive for reorders.
- Snooze: snoozedUntil timestamp on workItems, hidden from active view until then. SLA timer keeps ticking while snoozed β snooze hides the item from the active view but does not pause SLA obligations. Unsnooze cron runs every 5 minutes via a Temporal scheduled workflow. If the schedule misses a run, items stay hidden until next successful run (self-healing, no data loss). Temporalβs built-in schedule monitoring provides alerting on missed runs β configure a Temporal search attribute alert if unsnooze hasnβt run in >15 minutes. When a snoozed item resurfaces with elapsed SLA, the detail view shows a βSnoozed X hours β SLA continued during snoozeβ context badge so the user understands why the timer is high.
- Non-order emails: Emails triaged as intent=skipped do NOT create workItems. Inbox stays clean.
- Failed extractions: Stay in active inbox with error state + retry button (zero silent failures).
- Unsaved changes: Confirmation dialog when navigating away from edited item in split pane.
- Denormalized display fields: workItems stores
title,senderName,senderEmail,receivedAt,sourceType,confidenceScoreβ set once at creation, never updated. Inbox list is a single-table query with no JOINs. - Denormalized org/assignment: workItems stores
clerkOrganizationId,assignedToUserIdas proper indexed columns. Tab filtering (org/user/branch/all) works without joining emailAliases. - Composite index: Primary index on
(clerkOrganizationId, deletedAt, archivedAt, status, receivedAt DESC). Individual indexes onassignedToUserId,snoozedUntil, and source FKs. - New bulk-actions endpoint:
/api/work-items/bulk-actionstargets workItems directly. Old/api/emails/bulk-actionsstays for rollback during dual-write period, removed in Phase 8. - Optimistic locking: workItems has a
versioninteger column (default 1), incremented on every update. All mutations includeWHERE version = :expectedVersionβ if the row was modified concurrently, the update affects 0 rows and the API returns 409 Conflict. The frontend re-fetches and shows βThis item was updated by someone elseβ with a refresh button. This prevents data loss when two users edit the same extracted order or when a supervisor reassigns an item another user is actively reviewing. - Test order flag: workItems created via βSend test orderβ onboarding have
isTestOrder: true. Test orders are excluded from dashboard stats (coverage, SLA, team performance) but appear in the userβs inbox so they experience the full flow. Test orders are visually distinguished with a βTestβ badge on the row.
Clone / Reorder Semantics
Section titled βClone / Reorder SemanticsβCloning an archived work item creates a new workItem with sourceType='clone' and a clonedFromWorkItemId
reference. It copies the extractedOrder data (customer, items, shipping) into a new extractedOrder record.
The original archived item is unchanged. The new item lands in the userβs personal inbox as status: new.
Use case: repeat orders, seasonal reorders, corrections to previously submitted orders.
Scope Decisions
Section titled βScope Decisionsβ| # | Proposal | Effort | Decision | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smart customer-to-rep routing | M | DEFERRED | Great feature, but not critical for V1 unification |
| 2 | Inline order editing (full-width detail) | L | ACCEPTED | Core to the βSuperhuman for ordersβ vision |
| 3 | SLA timers on inbox rows | M | ACCEPTED | Directly drives urgency and order processing speed |
| 4 | Team performance dashboard | M | ACCEPTED | Managers are the buyers β they need visibility to champion adoption |
| 5 | Snooze feature | S | ACCEPTED | Small effort, high value for βwaiting on customerβ workflow |
| 6 | Delight bundle (D1-D5, see below) | S | ACCEPTED | Polish that makes the product feel intentional |
| 7 | βSend test orderβ onboarding | S | ACCEPTED | Dramatically improves first-run aha moment |
Accepted Scope (added to this plan)
Section titled βAccepted Scope (added to this plan)β- Inline order editing (full-width detail view: PDF left + form right, list hides)
- SLA timers on inbox rows (org-level threshold)
- Team performance dashboard (manager tab) β shows per-rep performance against org-level SLA
- Snooze feature (snoozedUntil timestamp, SLA keeps ticking)
- Delight bundle:
- D1: Unread count in browser tab title
- D2:
?key keyboard shortcut cheatsheet modal - D3: Source icons (email/upload/manual/clone) on each row
- D4: βCopy email addressβ branded toast
- D5: Empty state with visual pipeline progress
- βSend test orderβ button in onboarding
Deferred to TODOS.md
Section titled βDeferred to TODOS.mdβ- Smart customer-to-rep routing based on ERP customer data
Success Metrics
Section titled βSuccess Metricsβ- Primary: Weekly order coverage increases from 60-65% to 80%+ within 8 weeks of full rollout (coverage = orders submitted to ERP via ordermatic / total orders received by the customer from all channels in that week)
- Leading: >70% of new orgs copy their email alias during first session
- Leading: % of orgs with >0 email-sourced orders within 2 weeks of redesign
- Secondary: p50 time from work item creation to ERP submission < 5 minutes (for reviewed orders)
- Secondary: >50% of new orgs complete onboarding checklist in first session
- Tertiary: Support tickets about βhow to set up emailβ drop to near-zero
Coverage Metric Measurement
Section titled βCoverage Metric MeasurementβThe denominator (βtotal orders received by the customer from all channelsβ) cannot be measured automatically β ordermatic doesnβt have visibility into orders that never touch the system. Measurement approach, in order of reliability:
- ERP order count comparison (preferred): Query the customerβs ERP for total orders created in the period, then compare to ordermatic-submitted orders. Requires ERP read access, which the connectors project already provides for Prophet21 and NetSuite. Coverage = ordermatic submissions / ERP total orders. This is the most accurate source.
- Customer self-report (onboarding): During onboarding, ask βHow many orders does your team
process per week?β Store as
estimatedWeeklyVolumeon the org. Coverage = ordermatic submissions / estimated volume. Useful for orgs where ERP query isnβt available yet. - Trend-based proxy (fallback): Track ordermatic submissions over time. If submissions plateau while the customer reports growing volume, coverage is declining. This is directional, not precise.
For the dashboard βcoverageβ stat, use approach #1 when ERP data is available, fall back to #2. Display the data source: βCoverage: 87% (from ERP)β vs βCoverage: ~85% (estimated)β. If neither is available, hide the coverage metric rather than showing a meaningless number.
Migration Strategy
Section titled βMigration StrategyβBackfill
Section titled βBackfillβ- Run as a Temporal workflow (not a DB migration)
- Process in batches of 1000 emailEvents ordered by createdAt DESC (newest first)
- For each emailEvent with
providerMetadata.ordermaticInbox: create a workItem, copy inbox state - Idempotent: check if workItem with matching emailEventId exists before creating
- No downtime. Old UI reads emailEvents, new UI reads workItems. Both sources are consistent after backfill.
Backfill sizing (must verify before running): Run this query in staging before scheduling:
SELECT clerk_organization_id, COUNT(*) as total, COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE provider_metadata->'ordermaticInbox' IS NOT NULL) as inbox_eventsFROM email_events GROUP BY clerk_organization_id ORDER BY total DESC;Current estimate: ~50k emailEvents per org Γ ~10 active orgs = ~500k rows total. At 1000/batch
with ~50ms per batch (single INSERT with ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING), estimate ~25 minutes. But this
MUST be validated against production row counts before scheduling. If total exceeds 1M rows,
reduce batch size to 500 and add a 100ms delay between batches to avoid saturating DB connections.
Backfill runs with READ COMMITTED isolation (not serializable) to minimize lock impact on
production reads.
Dual-Write
Section titled βDual-Writeβ- Both emailEvent inbox state (providerMetadata) AND workItem are written in a single DB transaction
- This ensures atomicity β no inconsistency between the two stores
- Dual-write code paths exist during Phases 1-7. Removed in Phase 8 cleanup.
- If workItems write fails within the transaction, the entire transaction rolls back (including emailEvents update)
Lock contention mitigation: The email webhook is the hot path (~100-500 writes/day across all orgs
currently). The dual-write adds one INSERT to the transaction that already UPDATEs emailEvents.
At current scale this is negligible. If webhook p99 latency exceeds 500ms after dual-write ships,
the mitigation path is: (a) benchmark the INSERT overhead in staging, (b) if significant, decouple
the workItem write into an async post-commit hook (Drizzle afterInsert -> queue -> workItem INSERT).
This trades atomicity for latency: if the app crashes between commit and hook execution, the workItem
can be missing until reconciliation. During backfill there is also a race where backfill may insert a
workItem before the async hook runs; the UNIQUE constraint prevents corruption but duplicate-key errors
must be treated as idempotent success. Async workers should use retry with exponential backoff plus
upsert-or-ignore semantics to suppress noisy retries. Optionally limit backfill to emailEvents older
than a configurable cutoff (for example created_at > 1h) to avoid the hottest window. Monitor via
/api/webhook/inbound-email p99 request duration before enabling the async path.
Rollback
Section titled βRollbackβ- Feature flag
unified_inbox_v2OFF β old UI, reads emailEvents (still being written via dual-write) - workItems table is additive β can be dropped with no impact on old UI
- Old routes continue to function when flag is off
Implementation Phases
Section titled βImplementation PhasesβPhase Dependencies
Section titled βPhase DependenciesβPhase 1 (workItems table) ββββΊ Phase 2 (generalize UI) βββΊ Phase 3 (split pane) βββ ββββΊ Phase 4 (auto-archive + upload + snooze) βββββββββββ€ ββββΊ Phase 7 (nav + delight) Phase 5 (SLA + dashboard) βββ Phase 2 β βββΊ Phase 8 (rollout) Phase 6 (onboarding) [independent] ββββββββββββββββββββββPhases 3 and 4 can run in parallel after Phase 2. Phase 5 requires Phase 2 (needs workItems queries). Phase 6 is independent and can start anytime. Phases 7 and 8 are sequential and come last.
Phase Details
Section titled βPhase Detailsβ- workItems table + dual-write β Schema migration, Temporal backfill workflow, dual-write in
/api/webhook/inbound-email+ upload handlers - Generalize Inbox UI β InboxEmailRow β InboxItemRow, queries switch to workItems, bulk-actions generalized
- Full-width detail editing β Extract DocumentOrderReview as embeddable React component, full-width layout (list hides, PDF left + form right)
- Auto-archive + upload integration + snooze β ERP webhook triggers archive, upload creates workItem with auto-assign, Temporal scheduled workflow for unsnooze
- SLA timers + team dashboard β Server-rendered SLA from timestamps (not client clock), aggregation queries cached via stale-while-revalidate at the API endpoint level (5-min TTL, in-memory per instance is acceptable at current scale; move to Redis if multi-instance inconsistency becomes an issue). PDF viewer uses existing
PDFViewerWithHighlights.tsx(react-pdf based, already supports zoom + page nav + bounding box highlights). - Onboarding flow β Email alias hero empty state, checklist component, βsend test orderβ with rate limit (3/hour)
- Navigation consolidation + delight touches β Sidebar simplification, route redirects, D1-D5 delight items
- Feature flag rollout + cleanup β Enable for new orgs β beta customers β all orgs. Then: remove dual-write code, remove old pages (orders/index, review-pending-documents, inbox, dashboard), remove providerMetadata inbox state, remove feature flag
Frontend Effort Note
Section titled βFrontend Effort NoteβPhases 2, 3, and 7 are frontend-heavy (generalized row component, split-pane layout, keyboard UX, delight touches). Combined frontend effort estimate: L (human: ~2-3 weeks / CC: ~2-3 days). Consider a dedicated frontend spike for the split-pane layout before committing to Phase 3. Per-feature effort in scope table uses T-shirt sizing (S/M/L) for individual features. The aggregate note refers to combined frontend effort across multiple phases β not a contradiction.
SLA Timer Visual Treatment (from design review)
Section titled βSLA Timer Visual Treatment (from design review)βElapsed time badge on each row replaces the date column when SLA is configured:
- Green (<50% of SLA threshold):
text-green-700 bg-green-50β e.g., β2h 15mβ - Amber (50-90% of SLA):
text-amber-700 bg-amber-50β e.g., β6h 02mβ - Red (>90% of SLA):
text-red-700 bg-red-50 font-mediumβ e.g., β8h 45mβ - Breached (>100% of SLA):
text-red-700 bg-red-50 font-bold+ β icon β e.g., β12h 30m β β When no SLA threshold is configured for the org, show the regular date (no timer). Timer is server-rendered fromreceivedAtand org threshold β not a client countdown.
Interaction States (from design review)
Section titled βInteraction States (from design review)β| Feature | Loading | Empty | Error | Success | Partial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inbox list | 8 skeleton rows pulsing | Onboarding hero with email alias | βCouldnβt load inboxβ + retry | Rows render | New item arrives between refreshes |
| Detail (PDF) | PDF skeleton + spinner | βNo PDF attachedβ for manual items | βPDF failed to loadβ + retry | PDF renders | PDF loads, form still loading |
| Detail (form) | Form skeleton | Pre-filled from extraction | βExtraction failedβ + retry | Form populated | Some fields low-confidence (amber highlight) |
| Submit to ERP | Button disabled + spinner | N/A | βSubmission failed: [ERP error]β + retry | Success toast + auto-archive | N/A |
| SLA timer | βββ placeholder | No threshold β hide timer | N/A (computed) | Green/amber/red badge | N/A |
| Snooze | Instant (optimistic) | N/A | βCouldnβt snoozeβ toast | βSnoozed until [time]β toast | N/A |
| Dashboard | Stats bar shimmer | βNo data for this period" | "Dashboard unavailableβ + retry | Stats + team table render | Stale data (cache TTL note) |
| Onboarding | N/A | Email alias hero + copy button | N/A | First order β list view | Alias copied, no order yet |
| Send test order | βSendingβ¦β spinner | N/A | βCouldnβt sendβ toast | βTest order sent! Check inboxβ | N/A |
| Bulk actions | βUpdating X itemsβ¦β | Disabled when 0 selected | βX of Y failedβ toast | βUpdated X itemsβ toast | Some items failed |
| Clone | βCloningβ¦β spinner | N/A | βClone failedβ toast | βCloned to your inboxβ toast | N/A |
Navigation Hierarchy (from design review)
Section titled βNavigation Hierarchy (from design review)βSidebar simplifies to 4 items: Inbox (with unread badge), Customers, Products, Settings.
Dashboard becomes a manager tab within Inbox. /dashboard redirects to /inbox?view=dashboard.
/orders, /orders/new, /inbox all redirect to /inbox.
Detail View Layout (from design review)
Section titled βDetail View Layout (from design review)βFull-width detail replaces list (not side-by-side split pane). Clicking a row navigates to full-width view with PDF viewer (left 50%) + order review form (right 50%). Back button or Escape returns to list. j/k navigates between items in detail view (pre-fetches adjacent items). Cmd+Enter submits to ERP. On screens <1024px, PDF and form stack vertically.
LIST VIEW (default) DETAIL VIEW (on row click) ββββββββββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β Toolbar + filters β β β Back to Inbox [Snooze] β β βββββββββββββββββ β β ββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββ β Row 1 β βββΊ β β PDF β Order Review ββ β Row 2 (focused) β β β Viewer β Form ββ β Row 3 β β β β ββ β ... β β β β [Cmd+Enter] ββ β Pagination β β ββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββResponsive Behavior (from design review)
Section titled βResponsive Behavior (from design review)β- Desktop (>1024px): Full experience. Sidebar + list view as default. Click row β list hides, full-width detail (PDF left + form right, side-by-side). Back/Escape returns to list. Keyboard shortcuts active. Drag handle on PDF/form split within detail view.
- Tablet (768-1024px): Sidebar collapses to drawer. List view is default. Tap row β full-width detail with PDF stacked above form (vertical layout). Touch targets 44px minimum.
- Mobile (<768px): Bottom nav (4 icons: Inbox, Customers, Products, Settings). List-only view. Tap row β detail (stacked). No keyboard shortcuts. Simplified toolbar (search + filter icon).
Accessibility (from design review)
Section titled βAccessibility (from design review)β- Keyboard: j/k (navigate), Enter (open), Escape (back to list), e (archive), ? (help)
- ARIA:
role="listbox"on inbox list,role="option"on rows,aria-selectedon focused row - Screen reader: Each row announces βOrder from [sender], [subject], status [status], [SLA time]β
- Color contrast: All status badge colors meet WCAG AA (4.5:1 minimum)
- Focus indicators:
ring-2 ring-[var(--color-navy)]on focused elements (already in InboxEmailRow) - SLA colors: Red/amber/green are supplemented with text labels (not color-only communication)
Post-Submit Flow (from design review)
Section titled βPost-Submit Flow (from design review)βAfter Cmd+Enter submits an order to the ERP:
- Green flash on detail view border (300ms,
border-green-500) - Auto-advance to next unprocessed item in the list (pre-fetched)
- If no more items: return to list with βAll caught up!β empty state This is the core flow-state pattern β submission feels instant and the user is already reviewing the next order before they consciously decided to move on.
Manager Dashboard Layout (from design review)
Section titled βManager Dashboard Layout (from design review)βDashboard is a tab within Inbox (visible to users with hasElevatedInboxAccess()).
Layout: compact stats bar + team table, no charts.
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β Today: 47 orders Avg: 4m 12s SLA: 94% 87% β β coverage β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ β TEAM ACTIVE DONE AVG TIME BREACHES β β Sarah K. 8 12 3m 45s 0 β β Mike R. 5 9 5m 02s 1 β β Priya S. 3 15 2m 30s 0 β β (unassigned) 12 β β 3 β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββStats bar: 4 numbers in a row, text-2xl font-bold with label below in text-xs text-gray-500.
Team table: sortable by any column. Clicking a name filters the inbox to that personβs items.
β(unassigned)β row always at bottom in amber if breaches > 0.
βAll Caught Upβ Empty State (from design review)
Section titled ββAll Caught Upβ Empty State (from design review)βWhen all active items are processed/archived:
- Centered checkmark icon (green)
- Headline: βAll caught up!β
- Subtext: βNo orders need your attention right now.β
- Secondary action: βView archived ordersβ link Different from the onboarding empty state (which shows email alias hero for new orgs).
Snooze UI (from design review)
Section titled βSnooze UI (from design review)βDropdown with quick presets + custom option:
- βLater todayβ (4 hours from now)
- βTomorrow morningβ (next business day 9am)
- βNext weekβ (next Monday 9am)
- βPick date & timeβ¦β (date/time picker) Available as hover action on rows and as button in detail view header.
Onboarding Flow (from design review)
Section titled βOnboarding Flow (from design review)βInline banner at top of inbox list (not floating widget). Collapses as steps complete. Dismissible after all steps done. Persisted per-org (not per-user).
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β Get started with ordermatic β β β β β Connect your ERP β β 2. Copy your email address: β β orders@acme.ordermatic.io [Copy] β β 3. [Send a test order] β β β β Or drop a PDF here to upload β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββSend test orderβ sends a real email with a sample PO PDF to the orgβs alias. The order flows through the full pipeline (email β triage β extract β workItem). The user sees it appear in their inbox within seconds β this IS the aha moment. Rate limit: 3 test orders per hour per org.
Keyboard Shortcut Cheatsheet (D2, from design review)
Section titled βKeyboard Shortcut Cheatsheet (D2, from design review)βTriggered by ? key. Uses existing Modal component (size md). Two-column layout:
Navigation Actions j / k Next / previous e Archive Enter Open item Shift+3 Delete Escape Back to list u Mark unread v Set to "in review" Processing Cmd+Enter Submit to ERP ? This cheatsheet s SnoozeBackfill vs. Dual-Write Ordering
Section titled βBackfill vs. Dual-Write OrderingβEnable dual-write FIRST, then run backfill. This way:
- New items are captured by dual-write immediately
- Backfill fills historical items
- The idempotency check (UNIQUE constraint on emailEventId) prevents duplicates if both write the same item
- No race condition possible because the constraint is DB-enforced, not application-level
GSTACK REVIEW REPORT
Section titled βGSTACK REVIEW REPORTβ| Review | Trigger | Why | Runs | Status | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEO Review | /plan-ceo-review | Scope & strategy | 1 | CLEAR | SCOPE_EXPANSION mode, 0 critical gaps |
| Codex Review | /codex review | Independent 2nd opinion | 1 | PASS | 3 findings, 3/3 fixed |
| Eng Review | /plan-eng-review | Architecture & tests (required) | 1 | CLEAR | 4 issues resolved, 0 critical gaps |
| Design Review | /plan-design-review | UI/UX gaps | 1 | CLEAR | score: 5/10 β 8/10, 8 decisions |
- CODEX: Fixed extraction/submission workflow separation, desktop responsive alignment, dashboard interaction states
- UNRESOLVED: 0 across all reviews
- VERDICT: CEO + ENG + DESIGN + CODEX CLEARED β ready to implement