Performance Evaluation Process
| Owner | [Security Owner / management] |
| Effective date | [set on approval] |
| Review cadence | Annual review of the process; evaluations run on the cadence below |
| Version | 0.1 β DRAFT |
| TSC mapping | CC1.4 / CC1.5 (Performance Evaluation Process) |
1. Purpose
Section titled β1. PurposeβEnsure every employee receives regular, documented feedback on performance β including adherence to security responsibilities β so that competence and accountability are maintained.
2. Cadence
Section titled β2. Cadenceβ| Touchpoint | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Lightweight check-in | Quarterly | Direct manager |
| Formal performance evaluation | Annual | Direct manager + Security Owner sign-off |
(A small team may combine these; the annual formal evaluation is the minimum and is the documented evidence.)
3. What is evaluated
Section titled β3. What is evaluatedβ- Role performance β against the responsibilities in the personβs job description.
- Security responsibilities β did the person follow the security policies (Acceptable Use, Access Control, Change Management), use MFA, handle data correctly, and complete required security-awareness training?
- Goals β progress on prior goals; goals for the next period.
4. Process
Section titled β4. Processβ- Manager and employee each complete a short written assessment.
- They meet to discuss; the manager records outcomes, ratings, and goals.
- The Security Owner confirms the security-responsibilities section was assessed.
- The completed evaluation is filed (HR system / compliance platform) as evidence and retained.
5. Outcomes
Section titled β5. OutcomesβEvaluations inform development, role changes, and β where security or performance issues are found β a documented remediation plan with follow-up.
6. Review
Section titled β6. ReviewβThe process itself is reviewed annually by management.